Forum:Community Behavioral Reflections

Forums: Index → Stellar Garage → Community Behavioral Reflections

This proposal is a bit on the lengthy side; as such, it has its own page. Supertech1 T/C/E 01:07, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

Support - as the proposer Supertech1 T/C/E 01:07, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Question - What if the user having the CBR done doesn't agree to have the community discuss their actions? I think as a once respected member, it should be at the obligation of us to respect their wish to not be reviewed if they request not to be. We should seek permission from the user first. As a once trusted user, they will surely understand the CBR if we put it into effect.

Bonziiznob ^Talk

14:50, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Good catch. I appended Refusal by Contributor and Refusal by Requestor. Though it's not explicitly stated in the proposal, the point of a CBR is to prompt reflection--not to get people angry. If a CBR is going to cause trouble, it should be closed, protected, archived, removed, or whatever is necessary to prevent it from prompting further argumentative behavior. A CBR sort of implies that problems were so destructive that members of the community left; however, should one of the users return, even if only for the purposes of influencing a CBR, their wishes should take priority over the CBR guidelines. A CBR could be a bit intimidating to some people, so it's quite understandable if someone doesn't want their name all over the page. Supertech1 T/C/E 20:43, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Comment - So, basically, what we are looking to do here, is examine and discuss a certain situation, reflect on it, learn and apply? C.Chiam^Talk 06:05, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

More or less. It's just a way of saying, perhaps we could have done better here; what could we do differently in the future? Supertech1 T/C/E 14:58, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Support - Sounds good. C.Chiam^Talk 08:25, November 17, 2009 (UTC)